Anne-Sophie Perrissin-Fabert: First of all, we must focus on looking at the functional aspect of the solution. Beyond innovation, does this solution fulfill its role well? The SB&WRC project chose to work on insulation materials. As creators of certifications, we are always happy to see new solutions enter the market. Bio-based and recycled materials are an interesting source for innovation, provided that they bring true innovation while fulfilling their function perfectly. Is there a progression on performance? On longevity? And also, how easy is it to use?
Perhaps, it might have been easier to substitute raw materials from an existing industrial product with bio-based or recycled materials, rather than a creating a new product entirely. But as the project is done under the aegis of the European Union, it is understandable that manufacturers are only involved in a second step.
Anne-Sophie Perrissin-Fabert: When it comes to agricultural co-products, I think we have to make sure that there are no remaining pesticide residues, but also that the solution is impervious to fungal issues. In France, our health labeling of products only covers VOCs and some pollutants. With the development of biobased materials, it will surely be necessary to extend these verifications.
The sanitary issue of recycled materials is less important, but there will certainly be fears about the durability of polyester fibers.
Anne-Sophie Perrissin-Fabert: Field practitioners are pragmatic. To choose one solution over another, there are several concrete factors:
Adopting a new solution is also breaking a habit, therefore strong arguments are necessary to change it durably.
Environmental considerations will come only in a second time.
On the question of price, let's be careful about people's perception of recycled materials. They can be seen as second-hand products, which leads to a misconception that they would be cheaper than a "new" product. The same goes for agricultural co-product.
Anne-Sophie Perrissin-Fabert: From the point of view of environmental certification, innovation only makes sense if it brings more performance in at least one aspect. Does this new solution help reduce construction costs? Does it enable local economic development or create jobs? What is its carbon and environmental performance? For the same function, does it replace perfectly more traditional solutions?
I am curious to see the performances that the three SB&WRC prototypes will show after the tests in the laboratory and in real life. This bio-based/recycled dual approach is truely original. It matches with the emergence of the circular economy in construction and contributes to that trend.
Last updated on the 10-07-2018 by Sylvain Bosquet