Supermontparnasse Tower

  • Project type : Renovation
  • Building Type : Collective housing > 50m
  • Construction Year : 1968
  • Delivery year : 2015
  • Climate zone : [Cfb] Marine Mild Winter, warm summer, no dry season.
  • Net Floor Area : 15 000 m2
  • Construction/refurbishment cost : 5 000 000 €
  • Number of Dwelling : 270 Dwelling
  • Cost/m2 : 333 €/m2
  • Cost/Dwelling : 18 519 €/Dwelling

Moderated by : Alice Dupuy

Similar case studies

Forest in the Sky

Developed by Flamingo Dai Lai Joint Stock Company, Forest in the Sky is a unique real estate project with advanced green technologies located in Hanoi. Vietnam’s Coteccons served as the construction contractor for the eco-friendly (...)

The Link 345 Ciputra

Developed by Ciputra Westlake City Development Co. Ltd., The Link 345 Ciputra consists of three modern, 21-story residential complexes of nearly 600 two and three-bedroom units located in Hanoi. The residential towers offer a balanced (...)

HSB Living Lab

The HSB Living Lab (Gothenburg, Sweden) is a habitation infrastructure, in the form of student housing, that aims to be a co-creative social space for experimenting with sustainable technology and lifestyle in order to develop innovat (...)



  • Published on 09 July 15
    by francois PELEGRIN|France
    Viewed 8832 times
  • Proposed by :

  • Contest

    Trophées CoachCopro

    Prix du public

    ​Il s'agit de la rénovation thermique d'un immeuble de grande hauteur, construit dans les années 60.
    Cette rénovation de part les performances obtenues, la technicité et le contexte (copropriété de 270 logements en milieu occupé) est citée en exemple par la ville de Paris et l'APC.

    Architecture PELEGRIN created the digital model of the existing building then enriched it all along the project with technical solutions selected by the team and the owner.
    BIM was a communication tool and live decision tool for the 270 co-owners. It allowed "quick decisions" when decision timescales for condominiums is usually terribly long and the multiplicity of statuses (living onsite owners and landlords, retired and firts-time buyers, and more...) don't make things easy. During presentations in front of the co-owners, each inhabitant of the building could comprehend the project in its globality and visualize the consequences for their own apartment. Without BIM, the decision to vote the project would have required one year or even longer.
    All the design team (architects, engineers, etc...) used the same digital model.
    For the companies, BIM facilitated the construction phase in an occupied site: marked windows (what choices, what color) but also the coordinates of each inhabitant to make each intervention easier and ensure as low nuisance as possible.

    Certification Scheme


    15 rue Georges Pitard , 75015 Paris France

    Technicals Features