Residence Le Provence

4805
Last modified by the author on 27/10/2014 - 17:04

Renovation

  • Building Type : Collective housing > 50m
  • Construction Year : 2013
  • Delivery year : 2014
  • Address 1 - street : 13110 PORT DE BOUC, France
  • Climate zone : [Csa] Interior Mediterranean - Mild with dry, hot summer.

  • Net Floor Area : 9 482 m2
  • Construction/refurbishment cost : 2 792 445 €
  • Number of Dwelling : 122 Dwelling
  • Cost/m2 : 294.5 €/m2
  • Primary energy need
    44 kWhep/m2.an
    (Calculation method : RT 2005 )
Energy consumption
Economical buildingBuilding
< 50A
A
51 à 90B
B
91 à 150C
C
151 à 230D
D
231 à 330E
E
331 à 450F
F
> 450G
G
Energy-intensive building

Managed by LOGIREM, the residence Le Provence is a set of 122 apartments spread over 3 buildings, built in 1972.

Because of its energy label D and its aging equipments, the rehabilitation of this housing complex was considered as a priority. Respecting its sustainable development policy, the social landlord wished to have a comprehensive approach to promote occupant comfort, reduce rental costs and control energy consumption.

The operations undertaken by the landlord are designed to achieve the minimum C + label. Through various financial aid is an ambitious project that was launched with the aim of reaching a primary energy consumption by 40 kWhep / m² / year, a level corresponding to the "factor 4" covered by ADEME.

Sustainable development approach of the project owner

Each residence managed by Logirem has a technical state record with an overall score. Because of its energy label D and its aging equipment, Le Provence was identified as a priority residence and a thermal audit was performed. Aiming first thermal objectives, the owner nevertheless wished to have a comprehensive approach. Various aids have helped make it an exemplary rehabilitation.

Architectural description

The architect wanted to provide a simple and modern response. To settle with the old concrete facade,the coatings colors were chosen in harmony with the tone of the neighborhood (wet sand).
Silkscreen printed and dune color resin panels, affixed on the length of facade, are providing a contemporary touch. On balconies, vertical guard rails were projecting a negative image. They were replaced by modern guard rails with opalescent glass, that promote privacy and allows light to penetrate.

See more details about this project

 http://www.enviroboite.net/habitat-residence-le-provence-port-de-bouc-13

Stakeholders

    Contractor

    LOGIREM

    Pôle Réhabilitation Acquisition Amélioration - 04.91.28.04.02 - dmo.raa[a]logirem.fr

     http://www.logirem.fr/


    Assistance to the Contracting Authority

    BET SOLAR SEYNE

    06.22.24.14.58 / arnaudsarzacq[a]solarseyne.com

    Solar AMO



Contracting method

Macro packages

Type of market

Design and implementation

Energy consumption

  • 44,00 kWhep/m2.an
  • 90,00 kWhep/m2.an
  • RT 2005

    - Heating: 12,6 kWhEP / m².year - ECS: 22 kWhEP / m².year - Auxiliary: 1.8 kWhEP / m².year - Lighting: 6,4 kWhEP / m².year - Ventilation: 1,2 kWhEP / m².year

  • 163,00 kWhep/m2.an

Envelope performance

  • 0,66 W.m-2.K-1
  • Walls: Veil of reinforced concrete with installation of an external thermal insulation, panels STO PS 15 SE (150 mm) on common surfaces / (100 mm) on the balcony funds, coated D3
    Roof terrace: Concrete wall with polyurethane insulation Effigreen Duo (120 mm), recovery of tightness, protections and metal copings

    I4

  • 1,70

Systems

    • Gas boiler
    • Condensing gas boiler
    • Water radiator
    • Condensing gas boiler
    • Solar Thermal
    • No cooling system
    • humidity sensitive Air Handling Unit (hygro A
    • Solar Thermal
  • 18,00 %
  • Solar DHW with extra gas boiler. 2 storage tanks of 3000 L

Urban environment

    The residence is located in close proximity to the city center and the port, in the heart of a dense urban area with predominantly residential neighborhood. Many services are easily accessible: shops, schools, places of worship, etc.

Product

    xxx

    xxx

    xxx

Construction and exploitation costs

  • 2 792 445

PDF

Share :
Author of the page

Nicolas Guignard


Other case studies

More

Contest